Analysis of To His Coy Mistress Essay -- To His Coy Mistress, Andrew M

To his coy mistress is about depend onual feelings and infatuation, establish on the Italian tradition of courtly honor - it is filled with heed and references to sexual activity and deviancy but is generally a one sided be intimate, the solid poem is about the man wooing the woman and persuading her that she should have sex with him. Throughout the first stanza the poet writes how he would love the woman, had they had all the judgment of conviction in the world. The love is much exaggerated. I would love you ten years in the beginning the flood This is clearly an exaggerated statement because the flood happened onwards Christ, before the poet or the woman even existed. This portrays that he would love her forever. My vegetable love would grow vasterand more slow The poet is talking about time, about his love growing slowly but surely oer time. The reference to a vegetable the natural fruit of the earth symbolises how the love for the woman will ing grow over years, from a seed getting bigger over time- its natural and deep rooted love. The end of the poem becomes more weighty and hasted. The poet gets more desperate for the woman to accept his offer and to agree to stillness with him. A clear indication of a change in tang is turn upn in stanza two BUT times winged chariot stop number near Where the word But is placed at the start of the fourth dimension usually indicates that the statement before the but is about to be contradicted with a sentence of the opposite meaning (he was good BUT he is cosmos bad) the use of personification verbs add to the tone of the poem making time seem as a winged chariot emphasises the rush that the poet is in,... ...time Seemed night at noon day Though in the poem the ref is not given a sense of hurrying and anticipation but a sense of confusion portraying the emotional distress the poet is going through. As the poem progresses into the third an d last stanza the poet writes of his rejection and his pain cause by the topic he had so hopelessly fallen in love with. Is loves hit the sack always blow? this is a rhetorical question, comparing the of love which is idea to be warm and loving with passionate heat and comfort (positive) to snow cold harsh snow, with no colour, which is bleak and which brings death to all dungeon things (negative) - again the poet is using contrasting aspects in one sentence to show confusion too. The poet has been made to feel that love is a horrible, harsh and blistery feeling.