Sociology Essay -- Sociology Essays

Sociology is a field which developed everywhere a millennia ago, still it was not until the nineteenth century that it came into the fore as a bona fide hearty science, in need of its own classification apart from other companionable sciences. Sociology, the study of the process of companionship(pg.396, Ambercrombie,Hill,Turner), is a discipline, which is not exclusively independent in and of its self, yet borrows from many other disciplines such as history, geography, and anthropology. American sociology is fundamentally uninflected and empirical it proposes to examine the way of life of individuals in the societies &8230 prefers to justify institutions and structures in terms of the air of individuals and the goals, mental states, and motives which determine the behavior of members of mingled tender groups (pg.5,Aron).A specialization within Sociology is social stratification. This segment of sociology attempts to have it away with the structures of any given society and ones relationship with the institution. Social stratification means that dissimilarity has been hardened or institutionalized, and there is a system of social relationships that determines who gets what, and why (pg.11, Kerbo). Through various range of a functions, and theories we are able to come to a remedy understanding of social stratification.The paradigm that is most rational to my understanding of social stratification is the critical-conflict. In this paradigm the state embodies the interests of the "common citizen," and mediates between primitive person human desires and the rational need for freedom and well being. Conflict theorists lot that definitions of norms and values are also a source of conflict over who has the right to create laws and justice. As a consequence, not only behavior but also violence relationships become important topics to study. Unlike the structural-functionalist assimilate of society, which views harmony as the basis of order, conflict theorists see conflict as the natural state of social existence. Despite their critical examination of power relations, conflict theorists tend to accept the fundamental existing social arrangements, and sort of of arguing for new social systems tend to argue for rearrangement of existing relations.This paradigm (critical-conflict) shares with the uncritical-conflict paradigm an image or model of society that considers conflict and... ...ack the crucial tools such as family name, wealth, and networking opportunities. These tools are utilized to gain access to the cultivation necessary to achieve in a meritocracy like the United States. As the Upper Class and the Corporate Class wonder why those on the bottom are not able to pull themselves up by their iron boot straps and find solutions to their social, political, and economic predicament. The people on the bottom are utter the solutions yet the Upper Class and Corporate Class are bend a deaf ear.Bibliography1.) Aberc rombie, Nicholas Hill, Stephen and Turner, Bryan S. The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology. Penguin Books.London 19842.) Aron, Raymond, Main Currents In Sociological Thought. fix Books 1968.3.) Campbell, Ken. Http//cst.colorado.edu/psn/Marx/bio/Marx-karl/Granat/z.Html March 1,1999.4.) Kerbo, Harold R., Social Stratification and Inequality Class Conflict in Historical and Comparative Perspective. McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc. New York 1996.5.) McLellan, David., Karl Marx Selected Writings. Oxford University Press 1979.6.) Tumin, M., Some principles of stratification A critical analysis. American Sociological Review, New York1954