Roots of the Civil War

I believe that the Civil War began with the debate over the future of slavery. That very cope led to secession, and secession caused a state of war where the northwardern states fought for the ground of the Union, and the South for their independence as a modern confederation of states under its own constitution.It seems to me that any disagreement leads to some ca-ca of resentment. We tend to not like what we dont understand, and it was hard for the join to understand why the Southern states were itching for freedom from them. It seems from a broader position of view that the North has gone through so much on the button for the Southern states of America to exist. It only makes sense that Northern leaders would find oneself angry and betrayed by hearing that those states that they have worked so hard to comprise now want their own sense of independence.At the same age however, the South had more of a need for slaves than the north did. The agricultural musical compositio n of the South employed slaves to tend the large plantations and perform other duties. thraldom was a natural part of the Southern economy even though very few of the population actually owned slaves. Slaves could be rented or traded or sold to pay debts, making them very useful to ranchers. The North didnt seem to have much use for slaves due to their wretched soil therefor they could not understand why the South was against abolishing slavery.I dont believe that this war could be avoided due to the issue of slavery. If America didnt stand against slavery, whence the slaves themselves would have eventually make so. As said before, we dont like what we dont understand. Fighting with each other as opposed to fighting with who we then knew as them had more hope for success and peace in the end.